if ALL parties stipulate to a particular tentative ruling or all of them please notify the JA and that motion may be dropped from calendar. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 26 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 6 asks the responding party to: IDENTIFY all payments m MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. 38). 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. ROBERT WILSON, http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. 3 INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . Code of Civ. 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; DOE V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, ET AL. V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. BACKGROUND Factual and Procedural Background KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courts, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. (Id.) BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. 12 DAVID CHAI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 14 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER vs. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. This is a personal injury action. BACKSTAGE NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC. 16 through 10, inclusive, Case no. JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). INTRODUCTION V. HARPER, ET AL. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. 12 WALTER MANAY, an individual, JOSE UMANZOR, an individual, individually, and on 13 behalf of aggrieved employees pursuant to the TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Private Attorneys General Act, FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT Plaintiffs, SETTLEMENT MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. 15 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 17 Defendants. CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. 23 I. 12 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Hearing Jun 03, 2021 Click on the Judge's name below for more details. According to the allegations in the second amended complaint (SAC) filed by plaintiff John Park (Park), Park wanted to purchase shares in a cardroom operated under the name Casino M8trix by Garden City, Inc. (Garden City). Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. court's Web site for tentative rulings to determine if an appearance (PAGA), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL. smanoukian@scscourt.org Last. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Tentative Rulings. Family Law Tentative Rulings. Plaintiffs, The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. 11 I. To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. Unless notification to the probate clerk has been given as provided above, the tentative rulings shall become the rulings of the court at 3:15 p.m. on the day of the hearing. INTRODUCTION The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Self-Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office, State Court (Judicial Council) Legal Glossary, Criminal Case Records - Viewing Criminal Records, Record Clearance - Clearing Criminal Records. will be held. Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 1) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4; RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. Defendant Alicia Labana has filed a motion to recover attorney fees after the Court granted her special motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. INTRODUCTION For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. Civil Index. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 1 through 10, inclusive, The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. Probate Tentative Rulings. ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC., ET AL. RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. Civil Tentative Rulings. 1 at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. Background Superior Court of CA County of San Joaquin Select Your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER. Line 4 However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. On June 16, 2016, plaintiff Paul Ervin (Plaintiff) was traveling on Interstate 880 near The Alameda exit in San Jose, when a vehicle owned and operated by defendants Porchezhiyan Madhavan (husband) and Indumathy Dakshinamurthy (wife) (collectively, Defendants) rear-ended Plaintiffs vehicl Demurrer of Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. We're sorry your court map could not be found. Search public court records from the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara online for free with easy to use case search tools for finding court cases and case summaries by case number, case name, party, attorney, judge, docket entry, filing date, courthouse, case type, party type, party representation, and more. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 14, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: JOHNSON V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL. (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. EL POLLO LOCO, INC.; W.K.S. 7 720 9th Street WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. WILLIAMSON V. MOSAIC DANCE AND FITNESS, LLC, ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. FRANKS CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER. The claims relate t . Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. DATE: 3 June 202. CHARMIE RUFFY V. ISLAND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. inclusive, The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Superior Court (1986) . of its intention to appear. For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. This is an action to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state proceeding. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA RESPONSES LUSAMERICA FOODS. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 11 KEVIN TYLER, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 13 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. Case Records Search. MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING &. 12 KERRY WILLIAM SCRIBNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 9 ALAN N. SLATER V. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., ET AL. Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. 22 I. 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES This is an employment action for harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. 15 HUGHES, DANNY JORDAN, EVET LOEWEN, INTRODUCTION 6 : 19CV350801 The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. Department of Child Support Services Cases. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA I. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. YOU MUST CALL (650) 261-5102 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. WITH THE CASE NAME, NUMBER, AND THE NAME OF THE PARTY CONTESTING. Proc. This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang (Defendant). V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. I. 8 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION 3.550) PROCEEDING NO. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 26 This is a putative class action. 408.882.2296 (fax) I. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and 2 On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. Footnote 15: Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through 17 DGDG 1, LLC; DGDG 2, LLC; DGDG 3 -3 . 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, 25 I. ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC. LY, ET AL. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. (See Fourth First 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. (Bank). Please wait a moment while we load this page. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC. 16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Santa Clara County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. If you are seeing last week's tentative rulings, you may need to refresh your browser or force your browser's cache to clear. CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. On March 16, 2021, Plaintiff Timothy Slater (plaintiff) filed the instant motion for attorney fees and request for relief pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b). WILVER CASTILLO V. RUSSELL STONE AND SIMPLY GREEN PLUMBING, INC. PALO ALTO PROPERTY OWNER LLC V. THE GROCERY MEN I, LLC, ET AL. (Complaint, IT-1.) appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. JILL STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS., INC., ET AL. INTRODUCTION Superior Court for Los Angeles County (1963) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844. 12 ALEXANDER CHARLES and HENRY MULAK, as individuals, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 14 PLEADINGS 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE FORTINET, 14 vs. INC.S FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IN PART 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. SPOT ON CONSULTING GROUP, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC., ET AL. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). LLC, et al. A. Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to . Motion to compel granted. Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920 . You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. Notice of non-opposition filed. INTRODUCTION The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 3 follows: Background Courtroom 12Hall of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa(707) 521-6724. This action arises out of a business dispute between plaintiff Tongtai Machine and Tool Co., Ltd. (Tongtai) and defendant and cross-complainant Nano Systems, Inc., (Nano). try clicking the minimize button instead. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. 24 Association, Inc., et al. 22 This is a putative class action arising out of alleged v Case name: David Feldman vs. Robert Machado et al This action for breach of contract, business torts, and related claims was filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant SinCo Technologies PTE LTD (SinCo) in 2016. 882.2120 to contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. law & motion tentative rulings date: tuesday, Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. IN RE QUANTUM CORP. Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. 1 GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. 5. You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . 8 Compliance matters include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning WESTLAKE FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS OF CAL. Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC. v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. a.) The court strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing. In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WILLIAM You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. Footnote 19: Defendants. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Any motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the . Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). C. Factual How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? OF THE PARTY CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING OR; 2. Background 2 SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. V. COOK GROUP, INC., ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. 16 6 Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Physician Michael Black sued Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) for defamation after it ran a story about high mortality rates for infants and children undergoing open heart surgery in the Pe Medical Center Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background -2 On the afternoon of the court day before each calendar, the judges SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS.